The neutron is able to rotate a proton by 90 degrees.
A proton is able to rotate a proton by 180 degrees.
See Figure 1.
Figure 1 shows a proton and a neutron already touching, with a second proton approaching.
That is the before picture. The Ex dimension is marked on each proton, showing velocity of approach, relative to proton 1.
Figure 1: Neutron rotation field has abilities
As the proton collides with the deuterium, the incoming proton is rotated 180 degrees relative to its target proton, but only 90 degrees relative to the neutron. That is because the neutron rotates the proton it touches by 90 degrees. The result has two effects: first, the velocity vector Ex of the second proton is orthogonal to its previous direction of travel. Second is a polarization of Ht as it enters a line of protons. This prevents the protons from repelling each other. In the figure the old Ht directions of the two protons are seen to have wrapped around until they enter cancellation positions. That makes a new Ht direction to be established, relative to the neutron.
Protons in line do not repel because the neutron changes the Ht from omnidirectional to polarized. Then Ht is a flux in a direction orthogonal to that which the proton would have bounced.
Protons in line do not repel because the neutron and proton have an attractive flow, like gravity.
Protons in line do not repel because the Ex gets rotated 90 degrees and does not point at the second proton.
Protons in line do not repel because the neutron takes up one dimension from the proton. That leaves only two dimensions Ex Ey, which cannot make a volume flow to repel the second proton. That 2D film flow does not have a counter flow Ht to make a possible film acceleration repulsion, so the two protons do not repel near a neutron.
A proton is able to rotate a proton by 180 degrees.
See Figure 1.
Figure 1 shows a proton and a neutron already touching, with a second proton approaching.
That is the before picture. The Ex dimension is marked on each proton, showing velocity of approach, relative to proton 1.
As the proton collides with the deuterium, the incoming proton is rotated 180 degrees relative to its target proton, but only 90 degrees relative to the neutron. That is because the neutron rotates the proton it touches by 90 degrees. The result has two effects: first, the velocity vector Ex of the second proton is orthogonal to its previous direction of travel. Second is a polarization of Ht as it enters a line of protons. This prevents the protons from repelling each other. In the figure the old Ht directions of the two protons are seen to have wrapped around until they enter cancellation positions. That makes a new Ht direction to be established, relative to the neutron.
Protons in line do not repel because the neutron changes the Ht from omnidirectional to polarized. Then Ht is a flux in a direction orthogonal to that which the proton would have bounced.
Protons in line do not repel because the neutron and proton have an attractive flow, like gravity.
Protons in line do not repel because the Ex gets rotated 90 degrees and does not point at the second proton.
Protons in line do not repel because the neutron takes up one dimension from the proton. That leaves only two dimensions Ex Ey, which cannot make a volume flow to repel the second proton. That 2D film flow does not have a counter flow Ht to make a possible film acceleration repulsion, so the two protons do not repel near a neutron.
Neutron Powers 11/26/2022 essay below:
A symbol for neutrons could be a spiral to show its function, while a proton is an 8 pointed star shape to show its dimensions. A neutron can also be shown as a gear with teeth. An even number of gears makes for a stable element's isotope. An odd number of gears in a ring is not going to mesh, so that isotope is not stable. A figure is planned, here. This explains why elements like
molybdenum-91 is unstable
Mo-92 is stable
Mo-92 is stable
Mo-93 is unstable
Mo-94 is stable.
See the pattern? Adding one neutron can make it unstable, but adding two neutrons makes it stable. This shows a deterministic property. It is a mechanistic explanation. No quantum weirdness is needed. Mechanistic explanations should be sought, not shunned. Resort to old, weird teachings as a last resort.
Figure 2: Invisible neutrons, Green proton loops
Figure 3: Glass bead mock-up of pyramids on a cube
The pyramidal cube has its baryons nestled on the depressions in the cubic lattice of the core.
Strong Nuclear Force as gravity near-field
In a baryonic sphere stacking geometry of a nucleus, the gaps between
spheres can be open or plugged by a baryon. Gravity attracts protons and
neutrons together by at close ranges, the curvature of the spherical baryons
constrains the flow of spacetime. That curve follows the baryon's shape and
it affects the field strength. The result is that a "binding energy" phenomenon
has been named. That energy exceeds that which gravity is expected to provide.
Protons and neutrons are not transparent to gravity. It flows around those
spheres. That altered flow in the nucleus makes a gravity gradient of
extreme magnitude. It is so magnified that olde science called it the
strong nuclear force. It is gravity at a close range. Time flows out of the
nucleus through the gaps. That concentrates time so higher derivatives of time
are making a stronger nuclear force for nucleons near the gap. Cube gaps have
more force than pyramid gaps.
Neutrons do not have quarks. The paired proton-electron is held in a neutron
and is excluded from separating by the other pairs outside the neutron.
go to top menu
June 3, 2018 acf
Link to neutron coordinates in every element (protons, too):
Comments
Post a Comment